Breaking News

The *best* argument for over-the-counter hearing aids

    

 

D.C. Diagnosis Nicholas Florko

Hello, D.C. Diagnosis readers. Hope you had a nice long weekend. I want to give a special shoutout to STAT’s newly minted research reporter, Kate Sheridan, who helped me dig deep for the lead item in this week’s newsletter. No one else could dig into hearing aids lobbying with such gusto and skill. Thanks, Kate! I’m at nicholas.florko@statnews.com.

Scooplet: We found the best comment on an FDA regulation … ever. (And a stealth lobbying campaign)  

The FDA has already received more than 900 comments on a regulation that, if finalized, would allow the sale of over-the-counter hearing aids. STAT dug through those comments so you don’t have to, and we found what has to be the best comment the FDA has received in its 115-year history. I present to you Laura Munoz, who really wants the FDA to finalize its OTC hearing aid regulation so her boyfriend stops driving her nuts. 

“I fully support over-the-counter hearing aids,” she wrote. “My 80 y/o boyfriend can't afford hearing aids, and his hearing deficit is driving me nuts. For half of our conversations, I have to repeat myself loudly, sometimes twice, and enunciate each word slowly. I think my boyfriend is a great person, but his lack of hearing has a frustrating impact on our relationship. Please hurry with these aids. I'll gladly buy them for him if they are put on the market.”

(Yes, this is real. You can read it here.) 

Most of the comments flooding the FDA aren’t from pissed off girlfriends. They’re part of a letter-writing campaign from audiologists who would lose a serious chunk of their business if seniors could just buy hearing aids over the counter, without the help of a doctor. 

The form letter itself is pretty dull. It calls on the FDA to lower the max volume of OTC hearing aids, because, the letter says, the current limits could lead people to accidentally do more damage to their hearing. But experts say those changes would water down the entire proposal by restricting the number of people who could use these devices. 

A shadowy advocacy organization, known as Hear About Hearing, has also been pushing a similar message …and they’re not being subtle about it. The website’s homepage includes a bright red alert proclaiming that “The FDA's proposed rule on over-the-counter hearing aids badly misses the mark and could cause further damage to patients' hearing.” 

Why aren’t telehealth companies focused on women's health providing abortion pills? 

The FDA formally announced last month that pills allowing women to terminate a pregnancy at home would be permanently available by mail. It would seem a major win for the handful of telemedicine companies that have cropped up in recent years to improve access to other reproductive health products, like birth control. 

But a new investigation from STAT reveals that none of these companies are offering abortion pills out of fear of the controversy it’ll cause – despite appeals to do so from advocacy groups, and in the case of one company, even their own clinical team. 

As the head of one advocacy organization put it: “They're afraid it's gonna harm their business.”

For more, check out my colleague Olivia Goldhill’s story here.

What I want to know about Aduhelm  

It’s been a week since Medicare announced it would only pay for Biogen’s controversial Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm when patients enrolled in clinical trials, and everything is still crazy. 

Here are two of my biggest questions about the impact of the decision:

How the heck does this impact patients, especially those who want to start the drug now?

Aduhelm is a drug patients, hypothetically, take each month for the rest of their life. It takes months for a patient to even begin getting the highest dose of the drug. So what happens if someone wants to start the drug now, before CMS hypothetically finalizes its coverage decision in April? Will doctors stop prescribing the drug now out of fear that patients won’t be able to afford it come April? 

I posed that question to Dr. Jeff Gelblum, a private practice neurologist who says he’s treating roughly 80 people with the drug. He told me he isn’t turning people away, but he is warning them that the drug might not be covered come April and the patient may have to stop treatment, or start paying out of pocket.

“We are letting them know, we will do everything possible to make sure that this product is covered and to get you the medicine, but we cannot guarantee going forward after April that any of this is going to be covered,'' Gelblum said. “It’s a catastrophe, as far as I’m concerned.” 

It’s also unclear if these patients would be able to enroll in Biogen’s patient access program, which provides the drug for free. A spokesperson told STAT “Biogen’s patient assistance programs are continuing for eligible patients” but did not specify how long a patient can stay on that program. 

There’s also the question of how much Medicare patients would pay for the drug. No one has a good answer to that question, my colleague Rachel Cohrs reports

How will opponents try to stop this? 

There’s no doubt that pharmaceutical companies and patient advocates will flood CMS with comments urging them to rethink their approach – Biogen has already pledged to do exactly that.  But I’m curious what else drug makers and patient groups will do to ratchet up the pressure on CMS, like pushing legislation to crack down on CMS authority. 

The most obvious play is to use Congress to ratchet up the pressure.

Russ Paulsen, the CEO of UsAgainstAlzheimer's, told STAT his group "will be making sure that Congress understands just how unprecedented this proposed decision is." There’s also already one piece of legislation that could have a new life breathed into it thanks to CMS’ decision. That bill, the NOVEL Act, would mandate that any so-called coverage with evidence development decision, like the one that applies to Aduhelm, sunsets after four years.

Drug industry lobbyists who spoke with me were torn about the idea of pushing legislation. Some agreed that a legislative fix was necessary while others insisted asking Congress for anything could backfire, given the recent efforts to crack down on drug prices. 

Here’s a few more Aduhelm stories worth your time: 

Medicare’s Aduhelm decision has reignited a debate over racial inequity in Alzheimer’s care.

Biogen is trying to stem the controversy over Aduhelm by shopping for a company to acquire.

The biggest losers of Medicare’s decision might be Biogen’s competitors.

(More) STAT stories you may have missed   

If the FDA decides to update the Covid-19 vaccines to take better aim at Omicron or other variants, it will take a global approach, a senior FDA official told STAT.

A cascade of Omicron-driven shortages puts U.S. hospitals in a bind.

The solution to the wave of nurse resignations? Cold, hard cash.

Public health is missing crucial data on LGBTQIA+ people. It's not hard to collect.

Jolting the brain's circuits with electricity is moving from radical to almost mainstream therapy. But some crucial hurdles remain. 

Strong new evidence suggests a virus triggers multiple sclerosis.

Thanks for reading! More next week,

Lev Facher
@NicholasFlorko
Continue reading the latest health & science news with the STAT app Download on the App Store or get it on Google Play

Tuesday, January 18, 2022

STAT

Facebook   Twitter   YouTube   Instagram

1 Exchange Pl, Suite 201, Boston, MA 02109
©2022, All Rights Reserved.
I no longer wish to receive STAT emails
Update Email Preferences | Contact Us | View In Browser

No comments