GOVERNMENT FUNDING
Where are the NIH pediatric research dollars going?
Although the NIH distributed $362 million to fund pediatric clinical trials over three recent years, many of the results were never published. Specifically, of the 354 trials studied in a recent JAMA analysis, there was only a 54% likelihood that results would be published four years after the grants were completed. This absence of trial data underscores how a lack of transparency is causing millions of dollars in research funding to be wasted.
Already, fewer research dollars are granted for clinical trials involving children. "Studies have estimated that as many as 50% of drugs used in children are used in an off-label fashion, largely because industry is less interested in investing in pediatric conditions given the smaller markets and profitability for pediatric products," a co-author of the analysis said. "So pediatric research depends primarily on federal funding and there is a critical need for this funding to help fill in gaps."
Read more.
living forever
A decision due on Reata's ataxia drug
Friedrich's ataxia is a rare neurodegenerative disorder with little in the way of viable treatments. Reata Pharmaceuticals has developed a controversial drug called omaveloxolone that might alter the course of this deadly disease — but regulators may be torn. On one hand, the clinical data are limited and not particularly convincing. On the other, patients truly are desperate for anything that might slow the progressive damage to the brain. The agency is expected to announce its decision by Tuesday.
A single trial, completed in 2019, showed omaveloxolone improved neurological function compared to placebo. But regulators told Reata that the results were "not exceptionally persuasive." So it's a regulatory coin flip — and the company's stock could either jump dramatically on the news, or plummet. We'll see.
No comments