Regulation FDA prepares rules for drug-related apps
The Food and Drug Administration is expected to release new guidance on apps designed to work with prescription drugs this year.
Drug companies already have products that are intended for promotional purposes, to support adherence, help patients manage their conditions, or provide dosing guidance. Martin Culjat, SVP for regulatory innovation & digital medicine at consultancy Eversana told STAT that the forthcoming guidance, which could come as soon as this summer, will provide clarity to companies developing apps that have an "additive clinical effect." That's where the rules "get a little bit more fuzzy."
Eversana is helping risk-averse drug companies with bigger ideas navigate the murky waters.
"The intention is often to have some kind of impact on patient outcomes," said Culjat. For companies who want to do more with apps, "there's a lot of uncertainty. Can you reference the app on the drug labeling? What kind of clinical trials do you have to run? Do you have to submit something as part of a new drug application?"
Right now, it appears FDA anticipates most drug-related apps won't need regulatory approval.
In those cases, "only the output of these apps will need to be reviewed as promotional drug labeling," Culjat wrote in an article on the topic. The new framework, however, "does not alter and is independent from the regulatory framework for medical device software."
FDA started thinking about this long before the current explosion of interest in digital health: In 2018, it posted some of its thinking on the topic, and received comments from representatives from companies like Omada, and drugmakers Novartis, Otsuka, Takeda, and Teva.
Medical Devices
Boston Scientific acquisition nixed
Boston Scientific is scrapping its $230 million plan to buy a majority stake in M.I. Tech, a Korean company that builds surgical tools. Instead, the company will buy around 10%.
"Our agreement to purchase the majority stake of M.I.Tech Co., Ltd, from Synergy Innovation Co., Ltd, required global regulatory approvals that we were not able to obtain in some countries," Boston Scientific spokesperson Kate Haranis told STAT's Lizzy Lawrence.
The Federal Trade Commission said the deal fell apart apart in response to "investigations by FTC staff and our overseas enforcement partners."The medical device giant had agreed to purchase around 64% of the company last June. Boston Scientific focuses on minimally-invasive medical devices, and M.I. Tech would have contributed to its portfolio of non-vascular stents, devices that clear blockages in the body.
Read more here.
No comments