Closer Look
Opinion: Why violence has hurt Gaza heath care so much

Ali Mahmoud/AP
In a little more than a week since the Hamas terror attack on Israel, thousands have been killed and wounded, a toll made worse by 30 incidents of violence against health facilities, ambulances, and health workers in Gaza (a figure not yet verified) in the first five days of war. Violence against health care is hardly unique to this conflict, Leonard Rubenstein of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health reminds us in a STAT First Opinion, but why has there been so much damage, death, and injury to health care in Gaza?
The author of "Perilous Medicine: The Struggle to Protect Health Care From the Violence of War," he suggests that procedures agreed upon during previous conflicts to keep medical care safe have been abandoned. "Now, visceral and justified outrage at Hamas' atrocities and taking of hostages has led to a declining commitment to conduct combat operations in accordance with the law," he writes. Read more.
cancer
People are confused about detecting breast cancer
There's some confusion among Americans about breast cancer, whether it's what the warning signs might be or when mammograms are a good idea, a new poll from The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center suggests. While most people (93%) know a lump is a symptom of breast cancer, they were less familiar with other indicators: a retracted, inverted or downward-pointing nipple (31%), breast puckering (39%), loss of sensation in part of the breast (41%), pitting/thickening of the skin on the breast (45%), or nipple discharge (51%).
Screening mammography is a better tool to detect breast cancer, but the survey found one-third of women are confused about recommendations for when breast cancer screenings should start, and even more under age 30 (44%). While about 1 in 8 women will be diagnosed with the disease, 75% of women and 91% of men polled don't believe they will get breast cancer. About 1% of breast cancers are found in men.
climate health
Wiping away (if not out) pollutants from wildfires
We all remember the summer's eerie skies tinged orange by wildfires burning in the western U.S. and across Canada. The skies faded, but what about the residues left behind? New research in Science Advances compared methods to get rid of the indoor air pollution that might remain from trace gases in wildfire smoke, volatile compounds that can settle on indoor surfaces and pollute the air inside for days or weeks.
Researchers injected smoke into a test house for two weeks and then ran HEPA air purifiers, opened windows and doors, and cleaned surfaces. These pollutants persisted on indoor surfaces, emitting them back into the inside air for days after the smoke injections ended. Continued ventilation and air purifiers were ineffective, but vacuuming, mopping, and dusting surfaces worked better, reducing pollutants in the air ranging from 19% for furan and 50% for formic acid.
No comments