providers
Austin hospital district's day in court
Advocates challenging Austin's hospital district are scheduled for a court hearing today related to their lawsuit alleging that the district should have been using taxpayer dollars to provide care for the poor instead of paying for overhead costs at the University of Texas' medical school. I wrote about the conflict earlier this year.
Advocates argue that the hospital district had no legal right to spend taxpayer money on costs unrelated to care for indigent patients because it was funneled through the local government entity, which is charged with caring for the poor. Central Health filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit altogether.
The case has dragged on for years and is a test that could determine how local health care funding could be used across the state, which has one of the highest uninsured rates in the country. Stay tuned for updates.
drug shortages
When inspections lead to shortages
FDA's drug center chief wants agency inspectors to know when shutting down a facility will cause a drug shortage, my colleague John Wilkerson reports.
Speaking at an Alliance for a Stronger FDA event, Patrizia Cavazzoni, the director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, praised FDA inspectors and emphasized their independence. She stopped short of saying that inspectors are expected to go easier on facilities when shutting them down would cause a shortage. But she also said the FDA's drug shortage team will begin briefing inspectors on the ramifications of their actions.
"We have now a situation where we have so many single-source drugs, or essential medicines, that are made by maybe only two manufacturers," she said. "It's becoming increasingly important, because of that increased complexity, that we spend more time to brief and sort of educate investigators about, you know, the facility and the essential medicines that we expect to have in that facility."
politics
Progressives latch onto canceling medical debt
Senate health committee chairman Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) introduced a bill to eliminate all medical debt yesterday, tapping into a sleeper grassroots issue that affects millions. The shift could be a signal that progressives are pivoting to pay attention to the issue this election cycle, which is particularly notable given that Medicare for All has fallen off of House progressives' to-do list.
The proposal, introduced with Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), would make it illegal to collect medical debt incurred before the bill passes, prohibits medical debt from being included in considerations of patients' credit scores, creates a program at HHS to cancel medical debt, and places more requirements on providers related to charity care programs.
No comments