The need-to-know this morning
- Rocket Pharmaceuticals said a child with Danon disease, a severe, inherited heart condition, died after receiving treatment with the company's gene therapy in a clinical trial. The cause of death is still being investigated but Rocket said the patient experienced complications due to capillary leak syndrome, possibly tied to an immune-suppressing treatment used prior to the patient receiving the Rocket gene therapy, called RP-A501. The FDA placed the study on clinical hold.
- Biogen and City Therapeutics, a privately held developer of RNA-based "trigger molecules," announced a partnership to develop a drug for an undisclosed central nervous system disease. The research is still in preclinical development. City was co-founded by veteran biotech executive John Maraganore.
gene editing
Baby's custom-built CRISPR treatment revitalizes gene therapy industry
The success of a custom-built CRISPR treatment for baby KJ Muldoon — who has avoided a liver transplant thanks to a therapy that targets his unique mutation — has reenergized a struggling gene editing field, STAT's Jason Mast writes. Yet while the case shows the lifesaving potential of n-of-1 therapies, it also highlights steep challenges: limited organ targets, unsustainable costs, murky regulatory pathways, and a lack of financial incentive.
Researchers hope KJ marks a turning point toward scalable, individualized medicine, but for now, bespoke gene editing remains more proof of concept than paradigm shift.
"This study highlights the imperative society now faces: science can benefit many patients who would otherwise suffer enormously or die young from serious genetic diseases," David Liu, the Broad Institute biochemist who originally designed the gene editing system used to treat KJ, told STAT. "So we have an obligation to minimize as many manmade barriers as possible, including economic challenges, that separate the science from these patients."
Read more.
fundraisING
GlycoEra's global jobs underscore U.S. brain drain
From my colleague Allison DeAngelis: Just a few years ago, the chief executives at ex-U.S. biotech companies were swarming into Boston, opening offices near the biotech hub of Kendall Square. Well, the American political landscape and attacks on the scientific community have quieted that trend. And at least one biotech company is finding that their offices abroad are nabbing attention.
GlycoEra is fresh off of a $130 million fundraise, announced this morning, and has been recruiting clinical development experts as it prepares to launch its first clinical trial later this year. And it's finding that its dual locations in Massachusetts and Switzerland has become a draw. Job seekers, watching headlines pile up of new Trump administration policies, appreciate the option to relocate abroad, CEO Ganesh Kaundinya told STAT. Applicants who currently live outside of the U.S., meanwhile, are hesitating at the idea of moving stateside.
The torrent of federal funding, regulatory, and socioeconomic policy shifts have stirred concern. Some fear that it will cause a brain drain in the U.S., which might undermine the country's dominance in the sciences. So far, it's been more opaque just how the political landscape will affect drug industry recruiting and hiring.
GlycoEra is part of a wave of new autoimmune drug developers. The company is developing protein degraders that target IgG4 autoantibodies
gene editing
Unofficial ethics summit reframes global editing debate
Human dignity came to the forefront of an international genome editing summit in Cambridge, Mass. It brought together top gene-editing researchers, ethicists, artists, and policymakers who ultimately called for a global charter meant to guide emerging biotechnologies so they benefit the public good.
"Every time people feel that a technological frontier is breaking, there is this kind of excitement and suddenly the whole world is supposed to organize itself around this thing," Sheila Jasanoff, co-founder and director of the Global Observatory for Genome Editing, told STAT.
The first meeting of this ilk was in 2015, after the first reports that researchers in China were gene-editing non-viable human embryos. Last week's was the fourth, and though unofficial, it probed the value systems behind genetic innovation — raising urgent questions about power, governance, and equity in an era of geopolitical unrest and politicized science.
Read more.
No comments