Breaking News

ACIP firings, gun research defunded, & a different kind of global fertility crisis

June 10, 2025
theresa-g-avatar-small - light bg
Morning Rounds Writer and Podcast Producer
Good morning. We've got a lot of news for you today. If you're bad at staying hydrated like me, maybe take a few sips of water while you read. 

politics

RFK Jr. abruptly fires CDC vaccine advisory panel

A close up of Kennedy's face, looking serious.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has taken the extraordinary step of firing the expert panel that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, saying the action is needed to restore faith in vaccines. Kennedy broke the news himself in an op-ed published yesterday afternoon in the Wall Street Journal. Committee members were not informed in advance of the announcement, one member said. 

"We have just demonstrated that politics will overrun science in this administration. It scares me to think of what's ahead," said Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. Read more from Helen Branswell, with additional reporting from STAT's DC team. 

Relatedly, STAT published a First Opinion essay this morning by three participants in the Yale LISTEN Study, a patient-centered study to better understand long Covid and the adverse effects some patients have experienced post covid-vaccination. When a pre-print from that study was released, "the three of us were frustrated to see the usual suspects in anti-vaccine circles quickly twist the findings to fit their narratives." they write. But they add that proponents of vaccines have also disregarded their experiences. Read the essay to learn more about them.


public health

The uncertain future of gun violence research and prevention

Firearms are the leading cause of death among children and adolescents in the U.S. — more than car crashes, cancer, or any other condition. But documents from federal health agencies show that fighting gun violence isn't a major priority for the Trump administration. Like other longstanding problems facing today's youth, guns were not mentioned once in the report on children's health from the MAHA commission. And the first budget justification for the proposed Administration for a Healthy America eradicates all funding for firearm injury and mortality prevention research, which, for context, was allotted $12.5 million last year.

It's hard to predict how changing policy priorities will affect children in the years to come, but a study published yesterday in JAMA Pediatrics provides a small clue. Researchers analyzed trends in excess deaths from gun violence before and after a 2010 Supreme Court decision that found the Second Amendment is enforceable against states and local governments, therefore overturning local legislation like a handgun ban in Chicago. They found that in the 13 years after that case, there were more than 7,000 excess gun deaths among children and adolescents around the country, most of which took place in states with the most permissive gun laws. They add that more research, not less, is needed on what types of local legislation confer the most harm and the most protection. 


research

A declaration and a walk-back at the NIH

STAT's Anil Oza had two stories yesterday about new action at the NIH:

  • First: Several hundred NIH employees sign a letter of protest to Jay Bhattacharya, the agency's director, to rebuke many of the agency's actions since President Trump took office. The letter expresses concern over the cancellation of research on health disparities, climate change, and LGBTQ+ people; the proposed cut to funding for research indirect costs; and the firing of "essential" NIH employees, among other moves. Read more.
  • In the afternoon, the agency walked back a policy requiring universities and other research institutes to certify that they do not have unlawful diversity, equity, and inclusion programs or boycotts of Israel in order to receive research dollars. The rule, which was initially posted in April, was seen as the next stage of using research funds as leverage against private universities and efforts to increase diversity in the sciences. It is unclear what prompted the rescission of the policy, which is effective immediately. Read more. 


mental health

How many people are calling 988?
A map of the U.S. shows that contact rates for 988 vary greatly state by state

JAMA Network Open 

It's been almost three years since the launch of 988, the easier-to-remember number for the national crisis and suicide hotline. Between July 2022 and December 2024, there were about 16 million calls, texts, and chats to the line. That's almost 49 calls for every 1,000 people in the U.S., according to a study published yesterday in JAMA Network Open. But use of the line varies greatly by state, researchers also found. The map above shows the range. In the past year, about 45 per 1,000 people in Alaska have contacted 988, as opposed to just 12.5 per 1,000 in Delaware. 

The overall volume of calls to the hotline have increased over time — but crisis services that 988 counselors might connect callers to have faltered. The 988 contact rate for the past year (23.7 per 1,000 people) is less than half of the rate of adult emergency department visits that include a mental health diagnosis. To the study authors, that indicates that even more people could be utilizing the hotline. 


global health

A different kind of global fertility crisis

All over the world, birth rates are declining. It's often framed as a crisis, and political leaders have all sorts of ideas to solve it — in the last six weeks, both $5,000 "baby bonuses" and $1,000 "Trump accounts" have been floated here in the U.S. But according to a report published today by the United Nations Population Fund, the real crisis has nothing to do with declining rates. Rather, it's that high proportions of people globally "are unable to realize their fertility aspirations." Essentially, some people are having more children than they want, and others are having fewer. 

For the report, researchers conducted an online survey of more than 14,000 people from 14 countries. Eighteen percent of reproductive-age adults anticipated they'd be unable to have the number of kids they desired. Among people over 50, 31% said they did end up having fewer children than they ideally would have chosen, while 12% said they had more. 

It's a complex problem — almost 13% of all respondents to the survey said they had experienced both an unintended pregnancy and a time when they wanted to have a kid, but felt unable to. "What emerges is a concerning picture of obstacles to reproductive agency in every country investigated," the report says.


More around STAT
Check out more exclusive coverage with a STAT+ subscription
Read premium in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis with all of our STAT+ articles.

What we're reading

  • Domestic abusers could have easier path to getting gun rights back under Trump proposal, The 19th

  • GOP senators zero in on Medicaid policy in Trump's tax bill that has little impact on enrollment, STAT
  • A Palestinian doctor in Israel helps people on both sides, New Yorker
  • Avidity, FDA reach agreement on accelerated filing of rare disease drug, STAT

Thanks for reading! More next time,


Enjoying Morning Rounds? Tell us about your experience
Continue reading the latest health & science news with the STAT app
Download on the App Store or get it on Google Play
STAT
STAT, 1 Exchange Place, Boston, MA
©2025, All Rights Reserved.

No comments