psychedelics
Opinion: Why the VA shouldn't stall on psychedelics
The Department of Veterans Affairs is embracing psychedelic research, but unless Congress sustains momentum, there's a risk that veterans won't benefit, Reps. Lou Correa and Jack Bergman, along with Marine Corps veteran Juliana Mercer, opine for STAT.
MDMA and psilocybin have shown powerful results in clinical trials, and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are already pushing the VA to prepare its system, train clinicians, and build infrastructure ahead of FDA approval.
Veterans themselves, who face suicide rates nearly 60% higher than civilians, have been the most credible advocates for the benefits of psychedelic therapy, the authors write. They should not have to leave the country to access treatments that science and bipartisan consensus increasingly support.
"This is not about chasing hype," they say. "Congress must ensure the VA remains resourced and ready to lead — and that we don't allow this moment of progress to slip away."
Read more.
heart disease
New heart risk model reshapes statins debate
A new risk calculator for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, called PREVENT, is redefining who qualifies for statins. But fresh data suggest that lowering the treatment threshold from 7.5% to around 3% over 10 years would keep eligibility roughly the same, STAT's Liz Cooney writes, while better targeting those most likely to benefit from treatment.
The analysis, published in JAMA Cardiology, highlights both the promise and pitfalls of statins: They cut heart attack and stroke risk by up to 40% but raise diabetes risk in some patients. As the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology prepare updated guidelines this spring, experts stress the decision is less about numbers alone and more about patient-by-patient tradeoffs — balancing prevention with side effects in the nation's leading cause of death.
"There are some circumstances for which the answer is obvious: The person who had a heart attack should be on a statin," a primary care physician not involved in the study told STAT. "At a certain point, what is a benefit that's real but so small it's not worth it? It's a combination of complex science, but also subjective human values."
Read more.
No comments