pharma
Lilly looks into gene therapies for obesity
Speaking of Lilly — the pharma company has also signed a collaboration agreement with Remedium Bio to develop gene therapies for obesity and type 2 diabetes, Remedium said yesterday.
This is part of a movement by pharma compaines to develop longer-lasting treatments for obesity, which they argue will be more attractive to patients than the current therapies that are injected once a week. Novo Nordisk, along with Wave Life Sciences and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, have been studying the potential of using RNA-interference to treat obesity.
However, it's not yet clear how feasible it would be to create a long-lasting treatment for obesity, much less one that is a one-time therapy. Some experts also fear an over-medicalized approach to addressing the issue of high obesity rates. (We wrote about all that in an earlier story here.)
Remedium did not disclose the specific terms of the deal, but said that it will receive an upfront payment, equity investment, and potential milestone payments from Lilly.
drug pricing
GLP-1 drugs are cost-effective but still pose budget threats
A new analysis finds that Wegovy and Zepbound are cost-effective, but that still doesn't mean they are affordable for individuals, employers, or the health system.
The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, a nonprofit that tracks the cost-effectiveness of prescription medicines, determined that the GLP-1-based drugs are cost-effective since they help reduce the risk of many health issues like cardiovascular complications. ICER used the average yearly net prices for this analysis, which it said are $6,830 for Wegovy and $7,970 for Zepbound.
The conundrum is that because so many people are eligible for the drugs in the U.S., the health care system would not be able to cover their costs.
Nearly one-third of self-funded employers are considering stopping coverage or unsure about continuing coverage in the next one to two years, according to a recent survey by Brown & Brown, an insurance brokerage.
"They're both cost effective and completely unaffordable," said David Rind, ICER's chief medical officer.
Read more from STAT's Ed Silverman.
No comments