vaccines
Why the White House shouldn't compare U.S. vaccine policy to Europe's
Shortly after last week's chaotic ACIP meeting, President Trump signed a memorandum directing HHS to align the U.S. vaccine schedule with peer, developed countries.
"To the uninitiated, this might look like a sudden, erratic pivot. It is not," attorney Richard Hughes IV, who used to be vice president of public policy at Moderna, writes in a First Opinion piece for STAT. "It is the culmination of a calculated campaign I have watched unfold all year — a strategy of weaponized incrementalism."
He describes how the committee, now steered by political appointees, has eroded long-standing recommendations by amplifying debunked safety fears, injecting regulatory friction, and ultimately voting to strip the hepatitis B birth dose from the schedule.
"A core argument driving this dismantling — championed by the President and Kennedy — is that the U.S. is an outlier compared to nations like Denmark or Japan that administer fewer doses," he writes. "This argument is a lethal fallacy that relies on the public's lack of knowledge about international health care infrastructure."
Read more.
fda
FDA leadership's clashing standards deepen oversight risks
Under the current administration, the FDA is operating with striking ideological inconsistency, UC Davis professor Paul Knoepfler writes in a new First Opinion. Regulators are tightening evidence requirements for some products while signaling looser standards for others, he argues, which endangers patients and destabilizes the biomedical ecosystem.
As an example, Knoepfler points to the appointment of Tracy Beth Høeg as acting CDER director. Hoeg has been highly critical of Covid vaccinations while also previously offering patients stem cells and other procedures that were unproven. He notes similar contradictions in CBER chief Vinay Prasad's simultaneous demands for rigorous gene therapy data and support for policies that would lower evidence thresholds elsewhere.
"The inconsistency that has already manifested is bad for biotech and poses risks to the public," Knoepfler writes.
Read more.
sequencing
DNA sequencing firm Oxford Nanopore names new CEO
Oxford Nanopore Technologies, a U.K. DNA sequencing firm that has made headlines for its ability to decode complex parts of the genome, announced that it appointed Francis Van Parys as its new CEO. Van Parys, who is currently CEO of Radiometer, a Danish acute care diagnostics firm, will start in March. He's replacing Gordon Sanghera, who has led Oxford Nanopore since its founding in 2005 and made clear earlier this year that he'd step down in 2026.
The move comes at a time when the company, like other genomics firms, is dealing with academic customers wary of making purchases due to uncertain research budgets. Shares have fallen by around 40% since August.
No comments