obesity
Novo's next-gen obesity drug stumbles in Lilly comparison study
From my colleague Andrew Joseph: Novo Nordisk's next-generation weight loss drug CagriSema, one of the company's key hopes to help it regain its footing in the increasingly competitive obesity market, failed in a key study that compared it to rival Eli Lilly's tirzepatide, Novo said.
The open-label REDEFINE 4 study was designed to test whether CagriSema could help patients lose the same amount of weight as those who received Lilly's tirzepatide, which is sold as Zepbound and Mounjaro.
It did not. The disappointing details can be read here, but simply put, CagriSema did not perform equivalently to Lilly's drug — failing to achieve a statistical test of non-inferiority.
Novo shares were down 15% in early trading this morning.
rare disease
Gossamer's lung disease drug comes up short but company still plans to seek approval
Gossamer Bio said this morning that its Phase 3 trial of seralutinib, an experimental drug for pulmonary arterial hypertension, failed to meet its primary endpoint. Treated patients walked 13 meters farther than placebo over six minutes — a difference that favored the drug but wasn't statistically significant, STAT's Adam Feuerstein writes.
The therapy also raised tolerability questions, as 37% of patients experienced cough and 13% had elevated liver enzymes. Still, the company plans to file for FDA approval, arguing that a post-hoc subgroup comprising roughly two-thirds of participants showed a 20-meter placebo-adjusted improvement, even as the remaining third derived little benefit.
CEO Faheem Hasnain told STAT he sees a "reasonable chance for approval."
Read more.
health tech
AI petition tests FDA's bent toward deregulation
An Australian AI developer, Harrison.ai, is asking the FDA to let companies with existing clearances in certain radiology categories roll out new imaging algorithms without premarket review — effectively swapping early regulatory scrutiny for post-market monitoring. If the agency doesn't deny the petition by mid-April, it could take effect automatically, STAT's Mario Aguilar and Katie Palmer write.
The proposal, which would touch more than 200 cleared devices, comes as the FDA signals greater comfort with a "commonsense" AI framework emphasizing real-world surveillance. Notably, a former Harrison.ai subsidiary executive now leads the agency's digital health policy arm.
The argument at play: Some say the current 510(k) churn is stifling innovation and patient access. But post-market oversight is currently quite weak, and the concern is that exempting higher-risk tools like computer-aided diagnosis could create regulatory blind spots.
Read more.
No comments