Breaking News

RFK Jr. begins his testimony marathon

April 16, 2026
john-wilkerson-avatar-teal
Washington Correspondent, D.C. Diagnosis Writer

By the time this newsletter hits inboxes, I’ll be in New Orleans for the French Quarter Festival. I’ll be back on Monday. In the meantime, send news tips and your favorite sounds and flavors from the birthplace of jazz and Louisiana Creole cooking to John.Wilkerson@statnews.com or John_Wilkerson.07 on Signal.

politics

Can Kennedy stay on message?

Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. will have to walk a careful line between touting his Make America Healthy Again “wins” and avoiding talking about his politically divisive vaccine policy this week and next as he heads to Capitol Hill to testify about his department’s fiscal 2027 budget request.

Today’s hearings before the House Ways and Means Committee and the House Appropriations health subcommittee are Kennedy’s first since a heated appearance in September when tempers rose as Kennedy defended his firing of the CDC director.

Much has changed since September, when the MAHA movement seemed at the height of its power, and President Trump stood beside Kennedy and railed against the childhood vaccine schedule while linking Tylenol use during pregnancy to rising rates of autism.

As Kennedy runs a gauntlet of Hill appearances, we’ll be watching for what he says (or doesn’t say) on vaccines and how he interacts with the physicians on some of these committees, especially Senate health panel chair Bill Cassidy (R-La.).

Read more about everything we’ll be keeping an eye on here. – Chelsea Cirruzzo.



fda

Unleashing peptides?

The FDA will convene a panel of outside advisers to discuss whether to let pharmacies compound certain peptides, Lizzy Lawrence and Sarah Todd report.

In 2023, the FDA banned pharmacies from compounding 19 peptides due to evidence of several risks and a lack of safety data. But Kennedy is a fan of peptides, so this July an advisory panel will discuss whether to reverse that decision for seven of them.

Advisory panels don’t meet nearly as much as they used to. With three voting panelists and an industry representative, this one has more vacancies than members (though that could change). Read more to learn about the peptides under consideration.


obamacare

14%

That’s the percentage of Affordable Care Act plan enrollees who didn’t pay their premium in January, according to the actuarial firm Wakely Consulting Group.

After Congress failed to renew enhanced ACA premium subsidies, plan enrollment did not fall as much as might’ve been expected. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected the individual market would decline by about 20%. January enrollment figures showed a roughly 3% drop.

But regular readers of this newsletter already knew that enrollment is expected to keep falling because those numbers from January only showed how many people chose a plan, not how many paid their premiums. Some enrollees get a 90-day grace period for paying their premium, so a lot more people might drop their insurance this month.

Wakely’s report, first covered by The Wall Street Journal, is the first sign of the true impact of losing those subsidies. The firm projects that average enrollment could shrink 17% to 26%.

We’ll know for sure when the government releases final ACA enrollment data, which the last couple of years has come out in late July.


medicare

NTAP’ed out

For decades, government officials have tried to smooth the path between the authorization of breakthrough medical devices and their adoption by hospitals. They did this in part by paying hospitals a “new technology add-on payment,” or NTAP, for these technologies.

But it hasn’t always worked as planned, and Medicare officials have proposed rolling back that policy, Katie Palmer reports.

The FDA often designates technologies as breakthroughs before much clinical evidence is collected. That means Medicare can end up paying a premium for devices that haven’t demonstrated that they’re better than their predecessors.

Read more.


clinical trials

Better science through fines

Drugmakers and researchers didn’t submit results for nearly one in three studies where they were “highly likely” to be required to do so, Ed Silverman reports.

It’s an old problem, one that Congress tried to fix nearly 20 years ago with a law requiring clinical trial sponsors to register applicable studies and report their results on the government database ClinicalTrials.gov.

But compliance has been lacking, and FDA enforcement uneven. Now, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary is reminding researchers they could face fines. Some are skeptical that a crackdown is afoot. Read more for why.


More around STAT
Check out more exclusive coverage with a STAT+ subscription
Read premium in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis with all of our STAT+ articles.

What we’re reading

  • Hosting the ‘intellectual wrestling match’ between MAHA, public health, STAT First Opinion podcast
  • Top CDC director pick Erica Schwartz tests White House political balancing act, The Washington Post
  • AI could check millions of CT scans for heart risk. Who will pay for it? STAT
  • GOP pushes sweetener for cash-pay drugs, Axios
  • Opinion: RFK Jr.’s AI pilot program is a trojan horse for privatizing Medicare, MS Now

Thanks for reading! More next time,


Enjoying D.C. Diagnosis? Tell us about your experience
Continue reading the latest health & science news with the STAT app
Download on the App Store or get it on Google Play
STAT
STAT, 1 Exchange Place, Boston, MA
©2026, All Rights Reserved.

No comments