WASHINGTON
FDA 'breakthrough' device label drifts toward ambitious AI projects
The FDA's "breakthrough" designation for medical devices is subtly shifting. The AI tools receiving this status are moving beyond narrow image-reading aids toward broader systems that can detect multiple conditions, predict outcomes, or surface signals clinicians can't see, STAT's Katie Palmer writes.
A new analysis of STAT's Breakthrough Device Tracker suggests the agency is prioritizing more ambitious tools — especially in cancer and cardiovascular disease — while also laying the early groundwork for generative AI. But the label itself still does more to speed review than validate performance.
"People like to use breakthrough as a sort of marketing thing," said Josh Makower, co-founder of the Stanford Mussallem Center for Biodesign. But when a newly approved technology reaches hospitals and health systems, the label alone doesn't mean much, he said: "Okay, it's a breakthrough. Let's see what the evidence is."
Read more.
artificial intelligence
Insilico CEO discusses AI for high throughput drugmaking
Insilico Medicine says it's pitching a stripped-down view of AI drug discovery: speed and output over hype. In an interview with STAT's Brittany Trang after its new deal with Eli Lilly, CEO Alex Zhavoronkov said the company's real advantage isn't any single model or platform, but its ability to repeatedly generate preclinical candidates and license them before the slow, regulated clinical phase.
Instead of marking Insilico's success by a drug's approval, Insilico's approach is more about consistently producing assets someone else will pay for.
"Everything that we do is modeled after SpaceX," Zhavoronkov said. "We think that that's the only company that you should replicate."
Read more.
WASHINGTON
GAO finds FDA transparency gaps on ad comm conflicts of interest
The FDA has spent more than a decade failing to finalize and publicly share guidance on how it evaluates financial conflicts of interest among advisory committee members and guest speakers, according to a new review from the Government Accountability Office. The review recommends that the FDA should establish a timeframe for issuing conflict of interest guidances.
The report also highlights the broader pullback in advisory meetings, especially for drugs, and ongoing concern about industry influence.
"If the agency does not believe that disclosure of appearance conflicts is within its authority, then I would urge members of Congress to include such a provision in future law," Genevieve Kanter, an associate professor of public policy at the University of Southern California, told STAT's Ed Silverman.
Read more.
No comments