research funding
Brain drain?
STAT reporters have been all over the research-funding cuts that NIH announced Friday. I count at least six stories that Angus Chen and Jonathan Wosen have written.
The two team up for the latest installment, which looks at the risk of the United States ceding its dominance in biomedicine.
More than a dozen scientists and academics across the country expressed concern that attacks on NIH and academia could drive talented young scientists away from academic research or to positions overseas, damaging medical and scientific innovation.
industry
Pharma's deafening silence
If NIH funding cuts threaten biomedical research in the United States, you wouldn't know it from talking to drugmakers.
STAT's Adam Feuerstein looks into the matter. Drugmakers have decided it's best to privately engage the administration while publicly keeping their mouths shut.
But is that really the best approach? Read more from Adam to find out whether pharma might change its tactics.
personnel
NIH's No. 2 executive retires
Larry Tabak, NIH's longtime second-in-command official, is retiring, Lev Facher scoops.
Tabak's tenure spans four presidential administrations, and includes a nearly two-year stint as the agency's acting director following the 2021 departure of its longtime leader, Francis Collins.
At 73, his retirement is not shocking, but the timing adds to the unease at the agency.
executive orders
Payola
Is bribery really all that bad?
Trump is pausing enforcement of a law against bribing foreign officials, Ed Silverman writes. In an executive order issued on Monday, federal authorities were instructed to halt new investigations and enforcement actions while U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi reviews existing probes and assesses the extent to which the law promotes "American interests" and "economic competitiveness."
Has there been a problem of drugmakers bribing foreign officials? Find out by reading Ed's story.
No comments